<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Mike Anderson&apos;s Weblog</title>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/</link>
<description>my 2 cents on building companies, technology, venture capital, the world and life in general...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2006</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 18:11:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.16</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>The YouTube Phenomina ...</title>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 0.9em; FONT-FAMILY: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">It's truly a testament to what the Internet has enabled. Think about it. A website started a mere 16 months ago is now generating 20 to 30 million visitors a day with approximately 100 million page views a day.</span></p>
<p>Someone asked me what was the revenue model and I told them it didn't matter any more. It's taking the time to select the right model and add it incrementally. YouTube could easily turn on a 15 second advertiser video clip prior to each video served and likely have a $100 million dollar a year company. In addition to YouTube.com, there have been some incredible stories over the last couple of years. MySpace (obviously with its $580 million sale last year), Vonage, FaceBook, etc.</p>
<p>So, what's happening... some observations:</p>
<p>1) The Internet has become a lifestyle for many ... something they could (or at least) prefer not to live without... like the Microwave.
<br/>
2) Internet based businesses can scale at an unprecedented rate if they become successful. Never before could one medium reach so many people so quickly. Broadcast television perhaps, but the Internet is a bi-modal medium.
<br/>
3) The Internet, at it's old age of 15 or so, is definitely evolving again and its my opinion that broadband and mobile access are the enablers this time .... opening new markets, new solutions, and new opportunities.</p>
<p>These are amazing times... now if we could only get rid of Spam.</p>
<p class="zoundry_bw_tags">
  <!-- Tag links generated by Zoundry Blog Writer. Do not manually edit. http://www.zoundry.com -->
  <span class="ztags"><span class="ztagspace">Technorati</span> : <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/The%20YouTube%20Phenomina" class="ztag" rel="tag">The YouTube Phenomina</a></span> 
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/05/the_youtube_phe.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/05/the_youtube_phe.html</guid>
<category>General Nonsense</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 18:11:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Finally posting ... something totally unrelated, but..</title>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://ocean-liners.schuminweb.com/images/ships/united-states-05.jpg" style="DISPLAY: inline; FLOAT: right; WIDTH: 320px; HEIGHT: 149px" title="USS United States" height="149" width="320" alt="united-states-19.jpg (10517 bytes)" border="0"/>I have to admit, when it comes to large ships, cruise ships or classic ocean liner history, I'll spend hours reading or watching discovery channel shows. For some odd reason, I just become mystified with the topic and lose myself within it. Tonight, I stumbled across an incredible website this evening that catalogs some of the greatest cruse ships to be built.</p>
<p>If you are a fan, I'm sure you'll enjoy. Here is the link: <a href="http://ocean-liners.schuminweb.com/main-page.asp" target="_blank">The Classic Liners of Long Ago</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>

<br/>
<p class="zoundry_bw_tags">
  <!-- Tag links generated by Zoundry Blog Writer. Do not manually edit. http://www.zoundry.com -->
  <span class="ztags"><span class="ztagspace">Technorati</span> : <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/classic%20ocean%20liners" class="ztag" rel="tag">classic ocean liners</a></span> <br/>
<span class="ztags"><span class="ztagspace">Del.icio.us</span> : <a href="http://del.icio.us/tag/classic+ocean+liners" class="ztag" rel="tag">classic ocean liners</a></span> 
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/05/finally_posting.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/05/finally_posting.html</guid>
<category>General Nonsense</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 22:50:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CTIA 2006 will be an exciting year</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>CTIA's Wireless 2006 event in Las Vegas is arguably the largest wireless show on earth. Given all the exciting market and technology developments in motion that this will be the best CTIA to date. There are all sorts of new technology capabilities that will be on display. This year, more than any other, all sectors within wireless—and some from outside wireless—have new technologies to show off. It isn't the 1-dimensional, single buzzword show you can expect next week. It is multidimensional with all sorts of new technologies, applications and markets opening up.   One area I want to understand better is this wireless search, of which I am of the opinion that until most phones have a better UI, I think wireless search is over rated.</p>

<p>Hot areas that I will be checking out include: LBS (location based services), IP multimedia subsystem (IMS), mobile TV and video, any/all of those cool new 3G applications.  Being that I own a cell phone accessory business we have some new products that I'll be showing off to specific distributors & carriers.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/03/ctia_2006_will.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/03/ctia_2006_will.html</guid>
<category>Everything Wireless</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wireless expansion -- China appears to be the focal point</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It's no mystery that everyone knew that China could be a huge wireless market, <img src="http://www.mranderson.com/blog/3gsm.jpg" align="right" title="" border="1" hspace="5" vspace="5"> but real world numbers are being released / discussed at the 3GSM conference  in Barcelona.  China Mobile grew its subscriber base at a rate of 3.9 million new subs a month during the last quarter of 2005.   Those numbers are both stunning and mind-boggling when you do the calculations on future growth rates.  Even more interesting was the fact that Wang Jianzhou, chairman and CEO of China Mobile, said<b> the total revenue from mobile music in China surpassed the entire revenue of the traditional music industry</b>. He said a single song was downloaded 15 million times overChina Mobile's network in the last six months, a rate 15 times higher than a typical best-selling music CD.  The question to me is, can you trust the numbers?</p>

<p><img src="http://www.mranderson.com/blog/china.gif" align="left" title="" border="1" hspace="5" vspace="5"> I always thought it was interesting that the Chinese government pursed the TD-CDMA standard ... likelyto give the government more control and to capitalize on a proprietary  technology (don't forget, this is not a democratic government).  Thatsaid, it looks like global 3G standards will be allowed to compete in China.  In response to a question by GSM Association Chairman Craig Ehrlich, Wang said the Chinese government has committed to awarding 3G licenses this year and will have 3G networks up in time for the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing. He also said that the government is expected to issue 3G licenses for the TD-CDMA standard because so many Chinese companies have intellectual property in the homegrown technology.   Just what the world needed, another wireless standard.</p>

<p>With the numbers and growth that Wang reported, it seems impossible for any Chinese wireless operator to fail, but wireless networks don't come cheap. Some notes I have from  Shailendra Pandey, an analyst with ABI Researchwho cited several examples from around the world. Verizon Wireless, which continues to record the highest subscriber net additions in the United States and is expected to invest $15.7 billion, of which a significant part will be spent on network and IT systems, of which the goal being operational savings down the track. 3 Italy is expected to spend a total capex of approximately $1.1 billion in the next two years, most of which will be spent to extend the 3G network coverage to more than 90 percent of Italy's populace. And China Unicom, which spent nearly $4.8 billion (with disappointing results) on CDMA network expansion during 2005, will outlay a further $1.5 billion on its GSM network in 2006.</p>

<p>2006 is going to be an exciting year for the cellular / mobile around the world as the highly anticipated 3G networks, consumer devices, content and services become available to the masses <b>and</b> are affordable.  Unfortunately this all comes about  six years later than most people predicted back in 1999/2000.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/02/wireless_expans.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/02/wireless_expans.html</guid>
<category>Everything Wireless</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:42:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Off-Portal Content Trends 2006</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>One of my 2006 resolutions was to get my blog up and running again.  So, without explaining why I didn’t contribute much to the blogosphere in 2005, I’ll just jump into a fresh topic I’ve been thinking about.</p>

<p>The topic surrounds off-portal content and how much is Reality versus Hype?</p>

<p>The hype cycle is definitely in overdrive when it comes to the subject of off-portal content and how quickly consumers are adopting / consuming it.  The latest "sure" thing according to many entrepreneurs and upstarts is the direct-to-consumer retail play.<br />
 <br />
Although consumers still purchase the majority of their mobile entertainment from the wireless carriers' deck, operators in the U.S. markets are realizing that their walled garden  can be limiting when it comes to making purchases – particularly if a consumer is interested in buying an obscure ringtone, wallpaper, or application that didn't make a Top-10 list. This is causing some carriers to re-think their off-deck (portal) strategy and cautiously allow 3rd party / off-portal content access and sales.</p>

<p>The strategy amongst most carriers to address the direct-to-consumer challenge is to put 3rd party companies through a rigorous evaluation that leads to a “preferred partner" status, meaning that they have a solid billing relationship with the operator of which the operator will be sure to get a solid revenue cut and their content has met certain quality guidelines. Finally and maybe most importantly, the carriers want to make sure that their off-portal partners have a customer care department to field calls so that the operator's call centers aren't bombarded with inquiries if a consumer has a problem.   How a consumer is suppose to know when to call the carrier or “preferred partner” is still a mystery to me.</p>

<p>When you think about it, the logic and appeal of this direct-to-consumer retail play could be huge for big brands, particularly those that are already selling other forms of entertainment to consumers via their Web or retail sites. An straight forward example would be a record label, such as Sony or EMI who could promote and sell CDs from its various music artists and entice buyers to also buy a ringtone or a wallpaper featuring their favorite artist. This type of one stop shopping makes sense, particularly if you are trying to entice impulse purchases.  One completed, this gives companies a direct-to-consumer mobile marketing channel that can be very powerful if utilized properly.</p>

<p>The significant challenge is for unknown players that have no brand or existing relationship with the consumer.  I expect that the off-portal model will be a long uphill battle for these folks. How will these companies draw consumers to their Web sites to make purchases? How will they make consumers feel comfortable buying content from these unknown companies.  I certainly would trust a well-known brand before I'd trust some unknown player unless it is presented to me as a “certified” partner / company.  While I do have more thoughts on this subject, I’ll keep that for another blog entry.</p>

<p>To make it in the off-portal world, I think many of these early stage companies need a reality check on the difficulty level and should focus on marketing strategies enough to catch the attention of the consumer to gain access to their pocketbooks.</p>

<p>What do you think?<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/01/off-portal_cont.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2006/01/off-portal_cont.html</guid>
<category>Everything Wireless</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:23:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on NewCo&apos;s</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It was sometime during November 2004 when I was driving through the beautiful mountain ranges of Washington state when I came across a little town called "Startup" that caused be to jump out of my rig and grab a photo. <img src="http://www.mranderson.com/blog/enteringstartup.jpg" align="right" title="Mike Anderson in Startup Washington" border="0" hspace="2" vspace="2">  It was a moment that struck home with me and it influenced my decision to leave the private equity & venture capital space to pursue building companies again.  Not too long after that Kodak moment, I also made the decision that I wasn't going to start just one company, I was going to start three and one of those would be through acquisition.  To take it a step further, the two raw startups were going to be in areas I thought were extremely challenging: consumer goods.</p>

<p>Fast forward eight months and two of my three goals are underway, a physical consumer product company (FlyFashions.com) and a digital consumer based product company (Project X).  The acquisition is still a work in progress, but moving forward.</p>

<p>Last week Thursday I sat down with a great friend of mine (Kevin) for beers to talk business.  He has had a good career at MSNBC, but has peaked and looking for his next challenge. That said, Kevin is smart guy and someone I know well and can trust, so I propositioned him with the idea of getting out on his own and forming a partnership should the right business come along.  Kevin hasn't had the exposure to early-stage that I have, nor the opportunity, buy my general consensus is that he is at the right point in his life to jump off the corporate ship and into the waters of opportunity.</p>

<p>After six or seven beers and discussing several other businesses I've taking a look at, the night ending on a positive note with a handshake and a verbal MOU of mutual interest.</p>

<p>With that long rambling story now told, I should get to the point of this blog post.  There are a lot of bright people I know that focus on developing careers in the corporate landscape, yet I find time and time again, they become constrained by the environment itself and boredom.   I think Kevin will make a good entrepreneur and his time is now.  He has the smarts, the determination to accomplish goals and friends that can help him along in an environment that is completely foreign and challenging.  </p>

<p>Is the person reading this blog post also in the same position?  If so, take a step back, evaluate the resources you have at hand (cash, friends, significant other, knowledgeand experience).  Write down your thoughts, your goals and a general (e.g. realistic) timeline for accomplishing those goals.</p>

<p>When you feel comfortable and 88.88% confident that starting or buying a business is something you need to do to be happy, make it a priority and go after it.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/08/more_on_newcos.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/08/more_on_newcos.html</guid>
<category>Startups and Entrepreneurs</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:31:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FlyFashions.com - addressing the evolution of the mobile phone</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><br />
The company is called Fly Fashions or <a href="http://www.flyfashions.com" title="http://www.flyfashions.com">http://www.flyfashions.com</a>.  The emerging and targeted market need is high fashion cell phone accessories or as the fashionably hip call it: "mobile couture".   Specifically, Fly Fashions designs and manufactures exclusive jewelry lines for the mobile phone and mobile devices (iPod, MP3 players, etc).  The demographic is highly targeted:  Ages 14-40, fashion conscious people that desire accessories that differentiate themselves or express their personal tastes (much like jewelry, sunglasses, watches and purses do).</p>

<p>While cell phone "charms" have been extremely popular in Asia, they never really took off in Europe or the U.S., due (in my opinion) to the core demographic differences when it comes to appearance.  Hello Kitty just isn't going to fly in the USA or Europe.  The belief is that "high-fashion" accessories, like Fly's mobile jewelry are the right product for the U.S. and European genre.  The recently released report by <a href="http://www.arcchart.com/reports/fashion.asp" title="Arc Chart - Fashion and Style in the Mobile Handset Industry">Arch Chart - Fashion and Style in the Mobile Handset Industry </a> is another recent example of the growing trend towards consumer personailization vs. commoditization. A number of market studies have show that a majority of people view their mobile devices as more that  a tool, its part of their persona.  It will be interesting to to see how <a href="http://www.wildseed.com/index.htm">AOL's recent acquisition of WildSeed</a>, a company that focused on personalization of mobile devices will evolve as AOL continues to emphasize the importance of mobile.</p>

<p>Fly Fashions has a consumer web portal, but sells primarily thorough carriers, national distributors and mobile phone OEM's.  </p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/08/launching_a_new.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/08/launching_a_new.html</guid>
<category>Everything Wireless</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:28:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chernobyl - The next &quot;hot&quot; tourist destination</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><br />
I had to write something up about the recent article I read in the New York Post about tourist trips to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/15/international/europe/15chernobyl.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=ebd4eb259e8180ba&ex=1276488000&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">Chernobyl nuclear accident </a>site.  Even after 20 years the site still has dangerous levels of radioactivity and people are paying $200-$400 for a dose of up to several hundred microroentgens of radiation per hour.  </p>

<p><img src="http://www.mranderson.com/blog/Chernobyl-06-2005.JPG" align="center" title="" width="329" height="237" border="0"></p>

<p>At the end of the tour, the military scans you for radiation. Sure enough this joker has radioactive dirt stuck to the bottom of his show that set off an alarm and had to be removed before he could leave.   I'm booking my flight tomorrow as you just haven't lived until you've seen the site of a nucular accident!<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/06/chernobyl_-_the.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/06/chernobyl_-_the.html</guid>
<category>General Nonsense</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 03:49:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mobile Videos... coming to a handset near you.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm impressed with the rapid evolution of mobile video and see it as an exciting market opportunity.  For those not following the US market, US carriers Cingular launched MobiTV and Verizon with V-Cast earlier this year.   Slow adoption in the U.S. has been due to the lack of video capable phones and content.</p>

<p>The more recent news is that <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050602/lf_afp/afpentertainmentjapan" title="MTV will launch mobile videos in Japan">MTV will launch mobile videos in Japan</a> starting June 30th. I can only predict that this will follow the usual adoption path of Asia, Europe and then to the Americas.</p>

<p>I can only assume viewers will be forced to watch a 15 second advertising clip prior to the music video ... how else is MTV going to drive revenue?  Maybe through co-branded device.<br />
<img src="MTV Asia Awards 2005.jpg" title="" width="268" height="180" border="0"></p>

<p>Sumsung relased a <a href="http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/December2004/8840.htm" title="MTV Themed Phone">MTV Themed Phone</a> when it sponsored the 2005 MTV Asia awards.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/06/mobile_videos_c.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/06/mobile_videos_c.html</guid>
<category>Everything Wireless</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 06:17:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Blog in progress</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Its finally coming together ... new server, updates, etc.  What a pain in the ass when you don't do this hands-on every day. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/06/new_blog_in_pro.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mranderson.com/blog/archive/2005/06/new_blog_in_pro.html</guid>
<category>General Nonsense</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 05:31:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>